Talking Back, Otherwise
Art Museum at the University of Toronto
Jackman Humanities Institute
10th floor, 170 St. George Street, Toronto
16 September 2015–30 June 2016

Curated by cheyanne turions, with artists Marvin Luvualu Antonio, Valérie Blass, Bethany Collins, Jérôme Havre, Maryse Larivière, Jennifer Rose Sciarrino and Nicole Kelly Westman.

For more information, visit the Otherwise website or the JHI.

Exploring the Jackman Humanities Institute’s (JHI) 2015–2016 research theme of Things that Matter, the exhibition Talking Back, Otherwise considers what things—objects imbued with social relations—can tell us about society and history when they operate counter to our expectations, elongating the contemplative space between appearance and performance.

Imagine the wonder a mundane object can generate when it becomes the symbol of a great love affair. Or the transformation of a simple lump of matter into a glamorous commodity. Or the capacity for an image of injustice to instigate activism. In shifting perceptions of value, the object-world exceeds preconceived determinations of utility or meaning. The thing speaks. And it does so by talking back to us, by provoking our ire, desire or surprise.

The shift between what an object physically is and what an object emotionally or intellectually evokes is an unruly reminder of how people and matter are entwined. Through this relation, the thing doesn’t unbecome its appearance, but becomes more than. Not necessarily a function of the object itself but a register of the subject’s engagement with it, this excess is a product of reciprocal entanglement: the subject looking and the object looked upon write each other in turn. The provocations offered in Talking Back, Otherwise raise a chorus of explanatory ruptures. These works talk back (rather than just talking) because they operate at the edges of systems of classification that functionally yet inadequately serve to contextualize them.

What kind of speech can objects produce? In Talking Back, Otherwise, the collected artworks invoke what Ashon Crawley calls “Otherwise” in his essay “Otherwise, Ferguson”:

"To begin with the otherwise as word, as concept, is to presume that whatever we have is not all that is possible. Otherwise. It is a concept of internal difference, internal multiplicity. The otherwise is the disbelief in what is current and a movement towards, and an affirmation of, imagining other modes of social organization, other ways for us to be with each other. Otherwise as plentitude. Otherwise is the enunciation and concept of irreducible possibility, irreducible capacity, to create change, to be something else, to explore, to imagine, to live fully, freely, vibrantly. "[1]

In the oscillation between one way of understanding and another, in the interruption that points both to an explanatory paradigm and its limits, a critique of the normative world is made possible. By turns playful and serious, the works in this exhibition utilize shifting perceptions of value to comment on the strictures of systems of classification—poking holes, making fun, resisting. Because aesthetic practices need not adhere to the logic of the world as it is, strange visions can emerge, images of what might be possible if the organizing structures of the world were different. Within Talking Back, Otherwise, there is a sense of what these Otherwise possibilities are made from and what they might lead to.